Customer Reviews

Average Rating

4.5/5
131 reviews
Rating: 2/5

"I thought I had bought a THICK quality screen! Well all I can say is, if what I bought is "THICK" your standard quality must be so thin they wouldn't be worth buying, maybe you sent me the wrong quality? Very disappointed with the quality for the price I paid. See the photos taken from three different parts of the screen, the trees behind the screen make the screen look thicker on the photos."

Reviewed Wednesday, 12 December 2018

Rating: 2/5

"Paid for the "thick" screening but it is still very flimsy and see through. It's ok if doubled up but then becomes much more expensive. Has done the job but not as well as I'd hoped."

Reviewed Monday, 21 December 2015

Rating: 2/5

"advertised as thick screen so thought would be good quality but was just the same as screen bought from pound shop for half the price. Avoid."

Reviewed Thursday, 9 October 2014

Rating: 2/5

"If this product was the thick variety, would have hated to get the thin. Lots of gaps in it. It is used on a wooden fence to prevent neighbours pugs seeing into garden but not effective"

Reviewed Sunday, 31 August 2014

Rating: 2/5

"Not pleased with thinness of product very see through and it's supposed to be thick, would have sent it back but to much hassle wouldn't buy again."

Reviewed Friday, 15 November 2013

Rating: 2/5

"i ordered 3 thick thatch brush screening on one date and put it all up in the garden and thought that the quality wasnt as good as i hoped it would be. However i ordered another about a week later as i was short on quantity(my fault) but the quality of the later screen was 10 times better in terms of coverage. So a little dissapointed over all that i had put up three far sparser screens."

Reviewed Sunday, 23 September 2012

Rating: 2/5

"With a choice between 'thin' and 'thick' for screening, I opted for 'thick'. Well, it is a case of my definition and your definition of 'thick' being miles apart. What must the 'thin' look like?! Even with two overlapping, I will still have to buy another 'thick' to get near my definition of 'thick'."

Reviewed Saturday, 19 May 2012