Customer Reviews

Average Rating

64 reviews
Rating: 1/5

"I ordered 3 party tents. One box didn't have the correct poles so we could only use 2 of the tents and they were only suitable for one evening as they are poorly made. The poles snapped, the fabric came away from their fixings and the spikes weren't really strong enough to secure the base to the ground. Better to have bought a better product which would have lasted longer."

Reviewed Wednesday, 10 August 2016

Rating: 1/5

"I put this party tent up from new in my garden on Sunday 3rd July 16, lovely sunny day, for a surprise leaving party in the afternoon but after a little bit of wind the back lifted an the plastic on legs ripped away from the guy ropes leaving it unusable. Absolutel waste of money!!"

Reviewed Monday, 11 July 2016

Rating: 1/5

"The party tent did not have the correct holes to insert the poles we used duck tape in the end to hold the poles together as we had no choice on the time scale. I have taken step by photos to show the flaws."

Reviewed Thursday, 23 June 2016

Rating: 1/5

"Very flimsy. None of the joints stayed in. I had to tape them up"

Reviewed Tuesday, 24 February 2015

Rating: 1/5

"To start with.. My experience. In the past I have purshased and used dozens of this type of gazebo. On one occaision I bourght 60 for Porsche Club GB and with help, errected them in one day. Your product is by far the worse that I have encountered. Last Sunday tree of us from the Porsche Club (experienced) tried to erect it. Here is what we found. Insides of tubes were rusty, Clips were incorrectly fitted and when that had been rectified they were inefficient. One tube was not even slotted for a clip. When we tried to put the thing together the plasic parts were toio flimsy to support the structure. THIS ITEM IS NOT FIT FOR USE. It was impossible to reuse the original packing and the return coct via Parcelforce cost me 16.40. This was a most regretable experience."

Reviewed Saturday, 28 June 2014

Rating: 1/5

"Very disapointed qualaty very poor not as advertised"

Reviewed Wednesday, 4 December 2013